The patch has been split into 4 : jpeg.1.patch lexer.l.patch marker_o_rdwr.patch and pvrg-jpeg-etb.patch
This was easier for me to maintain. Let me know if this is a debian policy violation, or what os needed to make this clear. Thanks On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer <christoph.anton.mitte...@physik.uni-muenchen.de> wrote: > Package: pvrg-jpeg > Version: 1.2.1+dfsg1-1 > Severity: minor > > Hi. > > The upstream version of pvrg-jpeg-etb.patch > (http://www.panix.com/~eli/jpeg/pvrg-jpeg-etb.patch.gz) seems to differ from > what is shipped with Debian,... is this an accident or could you please > explain why? > > Cheers, > Chris > > > *** Please type your report below this line *** > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: squeeze/sid > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-heisenberg (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) > Locale: LANG=en_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > Versions of packages pvrg-jpeg depends on: > ii libc6 2.10.2-6 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared > lib > > pvrg-jpeg recommends no packages. > > Versions of packages pvrg-jpeg suggests: > ii libjpeg-progs 8-2.1 Programs for manipulating JPEG > fil > ii netpbm 2:10.0-12.1 Graphics conversion tools > between > > -- no debconf information > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Debian-med-packaging mailing list > debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging > -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org