tags 572886 + patch thanks Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 08:27 +0100 schrieb Mike Hommey: > Except there is much more difference between WebKit in Safari and Chrome > than between Gecko and Iceweasel and Firefox...
Sure, but it will help focus peoples' attention on Epiphany, of which some people still don't know it even exists. I also didn't mean to compare Epiphany to those two browsers, just mention them. My suggestion can be found in the attached patch. - Fabian
--- epiphany-browser-2.29.91.orig/debian/control.in +++ epiphany-browser-2.29.91/debian/control.in @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ and reliance on external applications for performing external tasks (such as reading email). Simplicity should not mean less powerful. Standards compliance is achieved on the HTML side by using the - WebKitGTK+ rendering engine; and on the user interface side by + WebKitGTK+ rendering engine (basically the same engine used by Apple + Safari and Google Chrome); and on the user interface side by closely following the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines (HIG) and by close integration with the GNOME desktop.
