On 03/11/2010 03:41 AM, Steven Luo wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:06:11AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
- " addu %0, $1, %2 \n"
+ " addu %0, $0, $1 \n"
Would it be better to use "move %0, $1" (as in isc_atomic_cmpxchg())?
That seems to be functionally equivalent.
I was going to suggest the same thing. It makes it more clear what is
happening. Not only is MOVE functionally equivalent, it is causes the
exact same code to be emitted, so you might say it is identical.
David Daney
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
