> On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 18:51 +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 03:58:31PM +0000, Jo Shields wrote: > > > I don't know how to make this packageable, given the bundling > > > restriction. > > > > Since it doesn't sound like solveable in a timely manner, would it > > be possible to have unofficial packages in the meanwhile? > > I'm going to package this in Ubuntu, and have been told by an Archive > Admin (equivalent to ftp-master) that the bundling isn't a blocker. > You're welcome to participate and build Debian packages from the > source: https://launchpad.net/~moonlight-team
Has anyone actually explained the situation to the ftp-masters and asked for an opinion/exemption? It seems that moonlight in Debian is being given up on rather easily. Either an effort should be made to package moonlight 2 and ship it with the next release, or else the ftp-masters reject it and should then be asked to remove moonlight from the archive rather than be forced to support increasingly ancient software. The ftp-masters can then explain to our users why moonlight just isn't good enough for Debian... Christopher Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
