Hi Florent,

On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 06:28:54AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 03:25:22AM +0200, Florent Bayle wrote:
> > Le Mercredi 22 Juin 2005 02:38, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > [...]
> > > > You should not remove wontfix tag, it's maintainer role to decide if he
> > > > will fix the bug or not.
> 
> > > The "wontfix" tag isn't really appropriate for an RC bug, however -- 
> > > either
> > > it gets fixed, or the package gets removed.
> 
> > Yes, but I think that this bug should not be RC (see below).
> 
> > [...]
> > > > Please have a look at libjpeg62 (#153467) to see how such problem is
> > > > treated.
> > >
> > > That bug shows people expressing the opinions that
> > >
> > > - we don't want to be hasty in removing software based on a patent before
> > > we have reason to believe it's valid and may be enforced against us - we
> > > consider the existence of prior art as sufficient reason to ignore the
> > > patent, since legally, the patent is invalid
> > >
> > > both of these things are true, but you haven't really shown how either
> > > relates to libpano12, AFAICT?
> 
> > http://www.virtualproperties.com/noipix/patents.html suggests that there is 
> > clear prior art in this case. I have taken this link from previous 
> > discution 
> > on debian-legal. But Robert Jordens thinks that :
> > "The prior art argument is pretty much irrelevant in our question as long
> > as the legal status quo is different and the patent has not been
> > challanged."
> 
> > It's why I want to know what I have to do in this case (can we let this 
> > software in Debian, even if the patent has not been challenged ?).

> Well, if the prior art exists which shows the patent is invalid, I'm
> personally satisfied that we can ship it, but this is actually the purview
> of the ftp team to decide.

Is this bug still being held open for some reason?  There don't seem to be
any packages depending on libpano12, so I think it would be fine to remove
the package from testing anyway if further investigation is needed.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to