On 2010-03-21 20:55:01 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 04:30:36PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Actually the sincos() function uses the x87 FPU (fsincos instruction), > > so that's not surprising that you get the same result. > > That just means that the precision is not an argument for switching to > the x87 FPU version, contrary to what your first email suggested. Both > are wrong.
My e-mail didn't suggest that. On the contrary, the glibc sincos() implementation shouldn't use the x87 FPU version, but should use the generic C implementation (like sin and cos) instead. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
