Am Samstag, den 20.03.2010, 14:01 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt: > Manuel Prinz <man...@debian.org> writes: > > This would enable to fix these in a timely fashion. I could start > > doing that tomorrow night. How does that sound to you? > > Sounds good. Sorry for my delayed answer :-/
No problem, same here! I do not have everything sorted out yet but the issues seem to arise from broken assumptions on where MPI stuff may reside. This is trivial to fix in some cases and harder in others. As an example, apbs expects {include,lib} in the same directory, which is not the case for mpich2 currently. Lucas, do you think we should "fix" this by providing this layout in the MPI -dev packages under /usr/lib/{openmpi,mpich2}/? It seems that apbs is not the only package assuming this but I did not generate numbers on that. It might be worth to have some consistency here nevertheless, IMHO. > > As for user-tagging, we can use the old-mpi-eol usertag. > > Sounds good, though I don't know for which user - feel free to use > debian-rele...@lists.debian.org. We have used debian-scie...@l.d.o, as mentioned in an earlier mail. The BTS URL is [1]. Best regards, Manuel [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=old-mpi-eol;users=debian-scie...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org