On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:51:41PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > This package should not be removed. The bug is partly theoretical and only > affects a minority of use cases.
ok, so you think it should be squeeze-ignore? do you think it should be ignored for any release in the future? or downgraded? having bugs which are marked as "grave", but at the same time are ignored forever seems like a slightly suboptimal usage of the BTS... cu robert -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
