Hi all On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 02:33:52PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:25:47PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: > > I want to get rid of octave3.0 for Squeeze. The attached patch should > > suffice. However, given that you are currently building mathgl.oct, but > > not *shipping* it in any .deb package, you might as well just drop > > octave3.0-headers from debian/control. > > I've fixed it with a QA upload I've just done. > Full diff is attached. > > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:30:09PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: > > I'm bumping the severity. According to #564422, there were people who > > wanted to adopt this package. > > Well, the package was orphaned already (even though the old maintainer > did not do the needed upload setting the maintainer to QA), the > interested people could just have taken the package already. > > I'm adding to the Cc of this mail the volunteers: Salvatore, Manuel, are > you still interested in taking over mathgl maintenance? If so, go ahead, > the package is all yours :-)
I'm still intrested in it, as it is a dependency of udav. However I'm sorry, I did not had that time in last months for learning first how to work around with packaging in the debian-science Team (git repos), and I did not arrived yet to the point to have a package ready, thus. It would be on the other side great to have updated mathgl and udav packages before squeeze freeze. But at the moment I cannot say if I can be able to prepare uploads for these two packages, since I'm already 'busy' with my main interest, the Debian Perl Group packagings. Stefano, or some others, if you would like to update the mathgl package to the current upstream version, help would be welcome! Bests Salvatore
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
