Stefano Zacchiroli writes: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:40:34PM +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote: >> The name of the file suggests that monotone-viz no longer requires >> lablgtk but in fact it FTBFS when the package >> liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev is not installed, so I am tempted to >> believe the bug is still present in the new upstream version. > > Yep, in fact it also looks like there's a bug in upstream version if, > despite the name, it FTBFS without lablgtk :-) If you can point me to > a .dsc of the new upstream, I'll be happy to have a look, but it feels > like that more generally you should discuss the FTBFS with upstream. > FWIW, the -custom bug is independent from whether lablgtk2 is used or > not.
Thomas has cleared up the confusion regarding lablgtk2; the issue with -custom remains. I have uploaded monotone-viz_1.0.2-1 but, due to [1], it will be some time before it appears in unstable. This upload closes the other two bugs outstanding but leaves #549463 open. I'll ping you when the new upload becomes available. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/03/msg00010.html -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
