Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> A backup and restore approach is a completely different and more
> complicated (in I/O sense) way than just deleting the files; e.g.
> for a single file:
>
… except that they do not operate on the same set of files. dh_backup's
list would be a lot smaller than dh_autoreconf's one. Besides, dh_backup
(or whatever its name is) could also delete files upon request ("dh_backup
--remove" would then be dh_autoreconf minus "autoreconf").
> dh_backup:
> 1. mkdir() - Create the backup directory
you can use then "debian/" directory here (provided you add a suffix to
backup's name). And, dh_autoreconf also creates a directory for excluded
files (if any). So, I don't think that this part is really relevant for
the comparison.
I think that all arguments in favour or against have been mentioned. I
don't have anything to add. If it really makes you happy to have this
package, then so be it :)
Cheers,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
