Jari Aalto <jari.aa...@cante.net> writes: > When using in debian/rules:
> override_<CH_COMMAND>: > Lintian displays warnings: > debhelper-overrides-need-versioned-build-depends (>= 7.0.50~) > if debian/control reads: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7) > SUGGESITON > The warning is naturally correct, but taken at face value, the version > number (while it may be technically correct) is not very descriptive > to the reader: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~) > The debhelper is already in version of 7.4.15 in Debian/testing, so > perhaps the message could be relaxed to a nearest "round" number: > debhelper-overrides-need-versioned-build-depends (>= 7.1) That doesn't make any sense to me. Why would we replace a tag which is accurate with one that isn't? Why is an incorrect dependency on >= 7.1 more descriptive to the reader than a correct dependency on >= 7.0.50~? -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
