reassign 576240 qa.debian.org thanks On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 07:20:49PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > reassign 576240 wnpp > thanks > > On Fri, 02 Apr 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > > Gentlemen, nowhere in e.g., > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576184 > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/150675/raw > > does it say what ITP stands for. That it probably stands for Intent to > > Package should be mentioned there in the text rather than hoping the > > newer user will search for the list of abbreviations. Same problem with the > > other WNPP items. > > The BTS itself has little to do with the standards used for filing > WNPP bugs. > > It's possible that this is a subset of a request to provide > information on a source package basis, perhaps through WAT or UDD or > something similar, but as of yet, no such solution exists.
bugs.debian.org was not the proper package but wnpp is not either, reassigning the bug to qa.debian.org. Jidanni is a bit vague in her bug report so unless she gives a better idea of what the problem is, i would suggest just closing the bug report. I consider the link in the bottom of the pages to the BTS help page enought explanation. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org