On 09/04/2010 08:59, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 01:37:17AM +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote: >> Package: libxml2-utils >> Version: 2.7.7.dfsg-1 >> Severity: normal >> >> This is probably akin to #496959. Since libxml2-utils does not have >> a doc directory for itself, the changelog shipped (and other files in >> usr/share/doc) ends up squashing those of libxml2. This would be bad if >> libxml2-utils were installed after libxml2, and then removed. > > Oh I see, the good old dpkg is not able to replace a symlink with a > directory problem... > > Mike > Possibly. I did not check if the _current_ version of libxml2-utils shipped with a symlink or a directory. If this is the case that it ships a directory now: * preinst should check whether /usr/share/doc/libxml2-utils is a link to the original target (and not another), if it is, then remove it. * prerm should reinstate it if there is an abort-upgrade condition. * there should be a conflict with current libxml2 version so that libxml2 files are reinstalled (by pulling in a new version of libxml2). No replaces necessary, since dpkg does not know they are the same files.
The last bit is optional (only if we are adamant about reinstalling libxml2 documentation files). -- Jean-Christophe Dubacq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
