On 2010-04-11 16:57 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:

> package emacs22-common
> notforwarded 529515
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> I think something went wrong when forwarding this message: I cannot find
> it in Gmane's archive.

Yes, looks like it did not arrive. :-(

> Also, is d...@gnus.org the correct upstream?

Yes, although it might be better to use the Emacs bug tracker these days.

> I noticed that their CVS [1] does not include mml-sec.el.

Strange, it is definitely present in my up-to-date checkout:

,----
| /usr/local/src/gnus% cvs status lisp/mml-sec.el
| ===================================================================
| File: mml-sec.el        Status: Up-to-date
| 
|    Working revision:    7.27
|    Repository revision: 7.27    /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/lisp/mml-sec.el,v
|    Sticky Tag:          (none)
|    Sticky Date:         (none)
|    Sticky Options:      (none)
| 
`----

> In a related note, this bug is still present in emacs23 (23.1+1-5).

It might be best to send it to bug-gnu-em...@gnu.org.  You can reuse
your original report, just edit the "Package" pseudo-header to say
"emacs,gnus" and remove the "Version" pseudo-header.

Regards,
        Sven



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to