Jari Aalto <jari.aa...@cante.net> (11/04/2010): > > Petr Salinger <petr.salin...@seznam.cz> writes: > > severity 549412 important
Yes. > A missing NFS support is unsuitable for release. No. > > serious > > is a severe violation of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a must or > > required directive), or, in the package maintainer's or release > > manager's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release. > > As described above I assume you did notice “package maintainer's or release manager's opinion” here. Which of them are you? No need for severity ping pong. > > The mount_nfs command is still provided only by freebsd-hackedutils: > > > > http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian/pool-kfreebsd-i386/main/f/freebsd-hackedutils/freebsd-hackedutils_6.1-4_kfreebsd-i386.deb > > http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian/pool-kfreebsd-amd64/main/f/freebsd-hackedutils/freebsd-hackedutils_6.1-4_kfreebsd-amd64.deb > > freebsd-hackedutils is not available from repositories testing or > unstable. That's what Petr wrote. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
