El 24/04/2010, a las 18:42, Petr Baudis escribió: > On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 01:10:24PM +0200, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: >> El 24/04/2010, a las 11:40, Jakub Narebski escribió: >>> I'd like for 'git commit -a' to *fail* if there are staged changes for >>> tracked files, excluding added, removed and renamed files. > > Thanks for this suggestion, this is exactly what I wanted to propose! > +1 here. > > I think this could even be made a default in some time, I don't see any > useful workflows this could prevent and adding -f is trivial enough for > those who really want to go forward. > >> For me this is going to far. While we don't want to make it _easy_ for users >> to shoot themselves in the foot, neither do we want to make it difficult or >> impossible for them to get the tool to do things that _might_ be a mistake. >> And what's the risk here? Accidentally committing too much is not a >> destructive change, and can be easily undone. > > Have you ever done this mistake? If you have done some extensive index > editing, it is actually a major PITA to restore, and can be even > destructive if your index and working tree are too much out-of-sync > (this does happen to me not so seldom while I also use -a a lot for > trivial commits).
Yes I have occasionally committed more than I meant to, but rarely much more, and almost never due to using "git commit -a", seeing as I hardly ever use it. I am of the "commit early and often" school, and my most common pattern is committing tiny batches of changes which I review frequently with "git diff" and then again by staging them with "git add --patch" (aliased as "git patch" seeing as I use it so often). >> IMO, the fact that the commit message editor is populated with a list of >> changed files that will be included in the commit is enough for people to >> see what's actually going to happen. > > BTW, I almost always use -m instead of the commit editor. ;-) Are you not a big fan of "subject line + justification" commit message format? Consider it one of the perks of using the format: your editor will show you a nice summary that gives you yet another chance to double-check what you're about to commit. Cheers, Wincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
