On 05/06/2010 09:38 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>> there's a test for "basename --" first,
>>
>> Can you find an actual example of this?  I think you read it
>> incorrectly, as really, autoconf first tests for 'basename -- /', but if
>> you indeed found an instance of autoconf testing for 'basename --', that
>> would be a bug in autoconf that needs to be reported to that list.
> 
> Sorry, I meant it was testing basename with "--" as the first
> argument while in this case it is useless. So, I wondered whether
> the goal of this test was to test whether this form was supported.

Yes, the goal of that autoconf test is to determine whether basename(1)
supports leading --, as required by POSIX.

>> Or, more likely, perhaps they are independently obeying what POSIX says,
>> without reference to either coreutils or busybox.
> 
> So, I think I should reassign the bug to busybox?

Yes.

-- 
Eric Blake   ebl...@redhat.com    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to