On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 12:42:50PM +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Can these patches be obtained?
Possibly -- would you be interested in extracting them and sending them upstream [1]? They are usually very responsive, and I monitor the list and can pull from there when they make it in. I don't like carrying patches not reviewed by upstream, because with this sort of code it is way too easy to make mistakes and break the semantics. It's much better if everyone takes a look at new implementations first. > Should libatomic-ops be built out of libgc source now that it's > maintained in libgc upstream? They're maintained as separate projects, although out of the same source tree. I think it's probably better that libgc ships with its version and keeps that in sync, and for people that just want the atomic-ops library they can use this package. -i [1] g...@napali.hpl.hp.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
