Hi, At Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:55:16 +0900, Hideki Yamane <henr...@debian.or.jp> wrote: > >Umm, I'd like to know your real intention of the email. > >Do you request me something? > > This is because maintainer seems to be busy to track this, I just > want to hear your opinion to deal with this.
dvipsk-ja is very useful. I want to resolve this bug with to the freeze deadline(too late?). > I think it's better to join texlive because it would also solve > Bug#562440 "dvipsk-ja: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find > library libkpathsea.so.4 needed by debian/dvipsk-ja/usr/bin/dvips > (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '')". I don't think so. AFAK this patch is l10n support, not i18n, so I hesitate to join texlive-bin package... BTW, I create dvipsk-ja package using upstream patch and upstream texlive-bin_2009 src. See this url: http://www.gfd-dennou.org/member/uwabami/software/tmp/ # I want to upload mentors.debian.net, but It seems the new queue of # this server is temporary down... This package is 4 lintian warning(ancient-libtool. this warning is unrelated to dvipsk) and piuparts clean. Requeset for comment. * Using upstream texlive-bin source. this is large file. Should I separate dvipsk source from upstream tarball? * Now I tested some personal tex documents. Please use dvipsk-ja and check result PostScript. Regards, --- Youhei SASAKI <uwab...@gfd-dennou.org> <uwab...@debian.or.jp> GPG fingerprint: 4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07 1024/DSA: 8BF1 ABFE 00D2 526D 6822 2AC6 13E0 381D AEE9 95F4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org