2010/5/15 Reinhard Tartler <siret...@debian.org> The following message is a courtesy copy of an article > that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.general as well. > > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 17:59:37 (CEST), Clément Mondon wrote: > > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: "Clément Mondon" <clement.mon...@gmail.com> > > > > > > * Package name : myscreen > > Version : 0.7 > > Upstream Author : Clément Mondon <clement.mon...@gmail.com> > > * URL : http://www.clement-mondon.fr/myscreen > > * License : GPL > > Programming Lang: C > > Description : A tab system and display system statistics for screen > > myscreen is a configuration of screen, a full-screen window > > manager that multiplexes a physical terminal. > > myscreen include screen configuration file and a program > > that provides several statistics. > > Configuration file allows to enable hardstatus bar in the > > manner of a tab system of graphical terminal. > > The program myscreen-stats provides several informations : > > number of users connected, uptime, upload and download rate, > > wifi quality, loadaverage, number of processes, cpus, disks, > > ram and swap. > > > > myscreen-stats was written in C unlike ubuntu's package > > named screen-profiles. > > is this intended to be part of the description? If yes, I'd suggest to > drop it, because: > > - it has been renamed to byobu > - the package is in debian as well > - is the implementation helpful information to decide which of the two > more appropriate for a given usecase? > > I had not seen byobu package, I agree. I propose : myscreen is much lighter than byobu. myscreen will not allow you to customize a profile, because all statistics are provided by a single small program written in C named myscreen-stats. myscreen is expected to consume very few resources and it is particularly suitable for systems with limited resources.
Thanks, -- Clément Mondon Site web: http://www.clement-mondon.fr Jabber: clement.mon...@jabber.org
