On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: > Package: libttspico0 > Version: 1.0+git20100205-1 > Severity: normal > > Hello, > > The pico2wave command should probably not be packaged along the library, > but as a separate libttspico-utils package (or maybe just pico2wave) > Thanks for your bug report.
I was wondering if having a so tiny package is relevant (Uncompressed libttspico0 is currently 388 ko pico2wave being 9.9 ko of it). Asked on IRC, I now understand the deep reason for this (see below). I will fix this in an uncoming version. As you are maintainer of various accessibility and TTS software in Debian, would you join me to maintain SVOX Pico? Mathieu Reference: (14:08:42) sathieu1: hello, is there a rule to split binaries out of lib packages? (Especialy when the lib package is tiny...) (14:09:51) Mithrandir: sathieu1: yes, how else can you bump soname and not conflict with the previous version? micah michi mick_laptop midget mikap Mithrandir (14:12:22) sathieu1: Mithrandir: if I have a "Provide: pkg-bin" in libpkg0 isn't is sufficient? (14:12:35) azeem_: sathieu1: pgk-bin? (14:12:46) ol: sathieu1: no, because libfoo0 and libfoo1 will both have the same file in (14:13:28) sathieu1: (okay, pkg is not a good example: real example is libttspico0) (14:14:06) sathieu1: ol: okay I understand now. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
