Re: Helge Kreutzmann 2010-05-30 <20100530141121.ga7...@debian-50-lenny-64-minimal> > > Helge, could you post your muttrc somewhere? > > Since it consists of several files, I tarred them up: > http://www.helgefjell.de/data/hkmutt.tar
Nothing suspicious in there. Re: Michelle Konzack 2010-05-30 <[email protected]> > Hello Stephen, > > Am 2010-05-23 14:02:55, schrieb Stephen Gran: > > Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; > > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; > > boundary="=_static.213-239-213-133.clients.your-server.de-18720-1274617968-0001-2" > > This boundary definitively does not come from Mutt... > > In the past I had some issues with foreign MTA's which inserted boundaries > of more then 100 characters and I know, mutt does not do this. Content scanners could in theory do this. Does your provider scan for viruses or spam in outgoing mail? Does your MTA? Helge: The test should be quite simple - your muttrc says you are saving copies of outgoing mail. Could you check the MIME boundary in the copy there? If that is different from what we saw, it isn't mutt's fault, but somewhere on the delivery path. Christoph -- [email protected] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
