Florian Weimer schrieb am Freitag, dem 04. Juni 2010:
> * Peter Palfrader:
>
> >> Stable has libisc40, and there are no conflicts with that TTBOMK.
> >
> > Ah. Apparently from the libisc50 that was in unstable (and testing?)
> > with bind 9.6 at one point and its backport to lenny-backports.
> >
> > Hmm.
>
> I'm not sure what to do about this. Upload a -0+lenny2 with a
> Conflicts:?
It'd need a Conflicts and Replaces.
> Post a follow-up to debian-security saying that if you
> have installed backports, you should remove obsolete packages first?
Here it required getting rid of libisc50 and libdns53. The dependency
tree is a bit of a pain in this case.
(Part of the problem is that those packages were still available on
backports.org because there aren't any auto-cruft runs to get rid of
packages no longer built from source. Else at least debian.org's
monitoring would have been alerted to the packages and we(DSA) would
have gotten rid of them.)
Anyway, I guess documenting it on d-s might be a good idea. Not sure a
new upload is warranted.
--
| .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
| `- http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
