On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:48:58PM -0400, Perry, Alexander (GE Infrastructure) wrote: > Oh, I didn't know there was a Debian SciPy list!
The package is maintained by several people and we use this list to synchronize. Discussing patches to apply to the package fits nicely with the topic of the list :-) The BTS is fine too. I've also sent some information to the scipy bugtracker (http://www.scipy.net/roundup/scipy/issue243) > I don't know; as far as I can tell, it isn't documented what upstream > intends the function to return. Feel free to pick which you think is > best and we can see what upstream does with my bug report. Bear in mind > there is a third result option, which is what I attempted to achieve. I > don't know whether it is the correct one, of course. The third option > is that the nan-removed dataset is a sample of the larger dataset, so > that the standard deviation of the larger dataset has to be increased > beyond the the standard deviation of the nan-removed dataset to account > for the increase in uncertainty. I see. I'll ask upstream about this. > Maybe you already have some of my fixes in your local tree? Maybe, I'll have to double check tomorrow to be sure. It's too late for me right now, I'm bound to make some mistakes. It is possible that the patch you sent me was partially applied and this brought confusion in my local tree. -- Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France). http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature