also sprach Martin Michlmayr <t...@cyrius.com> [2010.06.08.1124 +0200]:
> > It would be safer to use
> >    mdadm -As
> > to ensure all arrays are assembled, then
> >    mdadm -Ds
> > to create mdadm.conf
> > 
> > ... but why do you even want to create mdadm.conf ???
> 
> I'll let madduck answer this.

I have not yet found a way to ensure stable device names without an
mdadm.conf, so I have not yet made it optional. The current push to
UUID-based device access in combination with incremental assembly
might be the key.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madd...@d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"arrogance on the part of the meritorious is even more
 offensive to us than the arrogance of those without merit:
 for merit itself is offensive."
                                              -- friedrich nietzsche

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)

Reply via email to