severity 585408 grave
found 1:2.8
thanks

Bret, please include bug submitters in your replies to their bugs in
future. I did not see your reply until I thought to check on the status
of my bug.

I do not see how you can justify closing and downgrading this bug
without fixing the problem! I am aware that 'flashplugin-nonfree' is not
Flash itself; however, running 'update-flashplugin-nonfree --install' on
an amd64 system does result in the installation of an insecure version
of the Flash plugin that exposes users to the arbitrary code execution
vulnerability that I referenced in my original bug report.

Furthermore, there is no automatic update mechanism, or mechanism to
notify users of the installation of an obsolete and dangerous version of
flash; as a result, users who do not closely follow the Flash situation
will not even realise that they are exposed to this serious problem.

Without such an update and notification system, I do not see how
update-flashplugin is suitable for release, as the package "introduces a
security hole allowing access to the accounts of users who user the
package" which, according to [0] warrants grave severity.

[0] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities

-- 
Sam Morris <[email protected]>




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to