(Overquoting a bit since your previous message didn't hit the BTS)

On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 05:41:26PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
>> Yes, due to #319614, which says exactly the opposite of your bug report. :-)
> b.d.o was down when I submitted the report, but I guessed that.  This
> bug report is bogus.

Heh, OK.

>> That seems like an odd use-case to me. Wouldn't people normally use CGI.pm
>> and friends instead if they do not have Apache?
> 
> No, it is definitely not.  libapreq2 (unlike libapreq1) is meant to be
> used in many different ways in many different environments.  Your
> package just does not provide most of them currently yet.  Assuming
> that everybody uses the library with mod_perl and forcing all others
> to install apache 2 and mod_perl is bad IMHO.
> 
>> Well, it is Perl glue to an Apache module, after all...
> 
> No, it is not.  It is the Perl glue to a C library.  Only
> APR::Request::Apache2 is the glue to an Apache module, just one
> special case.
> 
> By the way, the perl modules Apache2::* are only convenience libraries
> providing similar interfaces to CGI.pm and libapreq1.  The "main"
> modules are APR::Request etc.  Therefore, I do not like the package
> name you chose (libapache2-request-perl).  It should rather be
> "libapr-request-perl".
> 
> What do you think about:
> 
>  libapr-request-perl Depends libapreq2
>  libapr-request-apache2-perl Depends libapr-request-perl, 
> libapache2-mod-apreq2

I'm not sure if I'd like yet another package split -- it's already up to
five binary packages for what I think is a relatively simple package. Adding
libapr-request-perl and libapr-request-apache2-perl would be two more,
totalling seven (one of them a dummy transitional package)... 

I might be skewed here, but are people really going to search for
“APR::Request::Apache2” and not “Apache2::Request” when going for the package? 
I'd probably be happy just splitting out libapr-request-perl to make it
possible to use the module without Apache, and keep libapache2-request-perl
as it is... or would that be evil?

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  • Bug#321955: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mail delivery failed: ... Steinar H. Gunderson

Reply via email to