---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Michael Erskine <[email protected]> Date: Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:17 AM Subject: Re: [Rxtx] gnu.io.RXTXPort discards exception silently if initialization fails To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
On 23 June 2010 06:38, Kustaa Nyholm <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I did change the code to >> try { >> z = new Zystem(); >> } catch ( Exception e ) { >> throw new Error(e.toString()); >> }; > > Is there a reason why this could/should not be: > > >> try { >> z = new Zystem(); >> } catch ( Throwable e ) { >> e.printStackTrace(System.err); >> }; Or even just let the exception bubble up and kill whatever thread caused the class to load :) I vote for the removal of Zystem BTW! Regards, Michael Erskine. _______________________________________________ Rxtx mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.qbang.org/mailman/listinfo/rxtx -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
