On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:02 +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > I'm not really sure what's the intended boot-sequence but I personally > think the legacy one makes more sense than the new dependency-based one > (ymmv). The problem is, there is not "intended" way of doing it,... many users may prefer totally different ways of stacking there layers... and you may have even more (nbd, losetup, etc.) and the same ones multiple times...
I'm currently looking into these problems,.. but I guess there is no easy way... AFAIK Jonas is also looking for a way to generically solve this,.... but all the other packages (lvm2, mdadm) are in principle also affected... But I also think, that we should keep for compatibility the older order. Cheers, Chris. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org