On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 13:56 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Hello André, > > On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 17:12 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote: > > Package: salome > > Severity: wishlist > > > > The Salome Meca platform has recently been released, see [1]. An archive > > made of binaries is available with Salome 5.1.3, Code Aster 10.1 and > > the ASTER module for Salome. The latter allows to use some of the Code > > Aster functionalities from Salome. > > This is terrific. > > > As Salome is already packaged and Code Aster is on the way [2], the Salome > > Meca platform ships only three relevant modules written in Python: > > > > - ASTER (allowing to run the Code Aster solver) > > - EFICAS (for editing Code Aster files) > > - PAL (an EFICAS dependency) > > > > Their sources should be published in a near future on the Code Aster > > website [3] and it could then be interesting to bring them to a > > salome-meca package. > > Great. If this is a separate source code base from Salomé, then it > should probably be a separate package, and we can rename this bug to an > RFP (request for package) or ITP (intent to package). > > Christophe, you mentioned that you are working on Salomé-MECA. Where do > things stand?
I add just started looking at Salomé-MECA... which is only available as binaries right now. I am focusing on getting a "clean" aster package with the help of upstream. Just a remark I tried to git-builpackage petsc on my squeeze box and I had some errors (malformated debian/changelog,...). Christophe > > > [1] http://www.code-aster.org/V2/spip.php?article295 > > [2] The current version can be browsed at: > > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-science/packages/code-aster/ > > [3] http://www.code-aster.org > > -Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org