Alan BRASLAU a écrit : > http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20091007 > > `` > Debian pushes development of kFreeBSD port > October 7th, 2009 > The Debian Release Team is pleased to announce that it sees the port of the > Debian system to the FreeBSD kernel fit to be handled equal with the other > release ports. The upcoming release codenamed 'Squeeze' is planned to be the > first Debian distribution to be released with Linux and FreeBSD kernels. > > The kFreeBSD architectures for the AMD64/Intel EM64T and i386 processor > architectures are now release architectures. Severe bugs on these > architectures will be considered release critical the same way as bugs on > other architectures like armel or i386 are. If a particular package does not > build or work properly on such an architecture this problem is considered > release-critical. > '' > > A missing mount_nfs makes kFreeBSD pretty incomplete for use. > The answers in this bug report makes the news announcement > pretty misleading. Furthermore, the handling the problem in such a way > >> At most important, but may be even just wishlist: > >> I assume you did notice “package maintainer's or release manager's >> opinion” here. Which of them are you? No need for severity ping pong. > > is pretty unfair for the good intention of users who are willing > to follow Debian in this direction. A reasonable interpretation > of the text of the news announcement would even make this issue > "release-critical". >
If some users consider the use of NFS very important, they can probably help to solve this issue. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org