On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:26:38AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes:
> > This particular wording allows for the non-free package to be first in > > the list of alternatives, which I think is clearly incorrect. The > > intent AIUI is to avoid installation of a package in main ever causing a > > non-free package to be pulled in automatically, regardless of whether > > non-free is enabled in sources.list. > > So I would instead suggest writing this as: > > unless this package is listed as a non-default alternative to a package in > > <em>main</em> > Good point. Here's updated wording, which starts from yours and tweaks it > a little bit to try to make it even more explicit. > diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml > index 0b3c1a1..06c1fdc 100644 > --- a/policy.sgml > +++ b/policy.sgml > @@ -476,9 +476,12 @@ > <item> > must not require a package outside of <em>main</em> > for compilation or execution (thus, the package must > - not declare a "Depends", "Recommends", or > - "Build-Depends" relationship on a non-<em>main</em> > - package), > + not declare a <tt>Pre-Depends</tt>, <tt>Depends</tt>, > + <tt>Recommends</tt>, <tt>Build-Depends</tt>, > + or <tt>Build-Depends-Indep</tt> relationship on a > + non-<em>main</em> package unless that package is only > + listed as a non-default alternative for a package > + in <em>main</em), > </item> > <item> > must not be so buggy that we refuse to support them, Seconded. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
