tag 322089 +pending thanks It seems that the code in question needs to be somewhat rewritten sooner or later.
Meanwhile, I'll have to drop the Provides:, or so it seems. :-/ From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 18:43:31 +0200 Matthias Urlichs wrote: >>No this is an old and deprecated API and should not be used. > Hmm. Then which API _would_ you suggest to replace > > gnutls_x509_extract_certificate_issuer_dn > gnutls_x509_extract_certificate_dn > gnutls_x509_extract_certificate_subject_alt_name The gnutls_x509_crt_* functions. You can check the implementation of the gnutls_x509_extract_certificate_dn() compatibility function to see the ones the replaced it. -- Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de - - Nothing is "mere". -- Richard P. Feynman, "Six Easy Pieces"
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature