On Tuesday 27 July 2010 00:00:52 Stefan Champailler wrote: > On Monday 26 July 2010 19:52:33 Gerhard Jaeger wrote: > > well I've two different N650U and they both work with the old > > settings and I had nobody like you wiht a N656 to test that's all... > > > > Anyway thanks for testing, I'll commit (is it the same wording as for > > CVs?) the patch ASAP. > > Hey not so fast ! I've tested successfully by changing one of the value. > Now, I didn't check other values. Maybe there's a setting that is better. > For example, the "sound" of the scanner is a bit different than before, it > sounds less "silent". Therefore I believe there's probably an optimum to > look for. So before committing, it might be worth make some more trial and > error and maybe actually understand the meaning of the value. Don't you > think ?
Go ahead, take your time and tell me when you've find a solution that lets the scanner move smoothly, fast and gives the expected results. Then I'll cross-check on my 650 devices. - Gerhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
