* Hidetaka Iwai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > retitle 322521 mozilla-firefox: please provide a development package > thanks > > Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I won't compete with the libgtkembedmoz that's provided by the mozilla > > packages. If Takuo wants me to start building them and not him that > > fine, but there's no point in having two implementations of the same > > thing. > > First, I'm sorry but I was wrong to assume that kazehakase need > libgtkembedmoz.so. Kazehakase does not need libgtkembedmoz.so anymore > in recent release. And it only needs libxpcom.so etc which are already > provided by mozilla-firefox package. > > So all needed is a development package. In this situation, could you > please provide a development package?
No, for the exact same reason, I don't want two competing mozilla development packages. Please use mozilla-dev. -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
