Petter Reinholdtsen <[email protected]> writes:
> That late in the shutdown sequence, I believe all scripts are already
> well-ordered, but if you find an example where that could happen, we
> should have a look and fix it. When every script in the archive is
> ordered, sendsigs get its own sequence number for both runlevel 0 and
> 6, so I do not believe it is likely to happen.
Only when the scripts do have the right dependencies. And they not
always do. For example chrony depends only on $local_fs instead of
$remote_fs and could be scheduled in parallel with sendsigs. People do
get the depends wrong and it would be nice to have an extra level of
protection for sendsigs.
The reason why I looked into this is that with ubuntus half conversion
to upstart sendsigs does run in parallel with other scripts and happily
kills them. And I wondered how well Debian is protected from that.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
