Le vendredi 06 août 2010 à 23:31 -0400, Scott Kitterman a écrit :
> If it's decided to release Squeeze with clamav, I think it would be good to 
> keep python-clamav too.  The main use case is for admins who have written 
> their own scripts.
> 
> I don't think it will be that difficult to keep up.  Clamav upstream is doing 
> a 
> better job with maintaining ABI compatibility.  If the current maintainer is 
> not interested in maintaining this in Squeeze, I'd be glad to adopt it into 
> DPMT where we are already maintaining python-pyclamd.
> 
> Scott K
> 
> P.S.  I'm not subscribed to debian-release, so please cc me on any replies.

Hi Scott !

As upstream says: "You are now strongly encouraged to use pyClamd" [1]

So I think the best thing to do would be to abandon this package. But if
clamav enter Squeeze and you want to maintain python-pyclamav, feel free
to adopt it.

Regards,

Cédric

[1] http://xael.org/norman/python/pyclamav/





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to