On Tuesday 16 August 2005 09:25, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > Hello Paul, > > You may have found a fault in the man page, but I believe > the fault may be the converse of what you think. >... > > The following note on the same page implies that this behavior is > > intentional, and the documentation incorrect: > > "the parent thread ID will be written in case CLONE_PARENT_SETTID" > > It is the above part of the manual page that I believe is incorrect.
When I look again, your analysis seems correct. I'm working on a linux syscall emulator (qemu). I thought I was getting glibc assertion failures because of this issue. However I can't reproduce those failures now. Sorry about the misleading bug report. Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
