tags 318516 patch
thanks
Here is a tested patch to fix this problem. Note that I believe GCC has
since been modified to make this a warning rather than a hard error, which
means that this bug may no longer cause a FTBFS, but the patch should
really be applied regardless. I haven't verified that the FTBFS is gone
without this patch, only with it.
For those curious, the problem is that glibc prototypes revoke but doesn't
actually provide it (instead, it provides a stub function that always
fails). So krb4 correctly tries to build its own replacement revoke
function, but the static declaration conflicts with the glibc shared
declaration.
diff -Nru3 ./krb4-1.2.2/appl/bsd/forkpty.c
../build-tree.new/krb4-1.2.2/appl/bsd/forkpty.c
--- ./krb4-1.2.2/appl/bsd/forkpty.c 2001-08-25 20:42:05.000000000 -0700
+++ ../build-tree.new/krb4-1.2.2/appl/bsd/forkpty.c 2005-08-16
13:15:42.000000000 -0700
@@ -68,7 +68,6 @@
#endif
#ifndef HAVE_REVOKE
-static
int
revoke(const char *line)
{
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
