tag 588017 + squeeze-ignore
thanks

On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 16:24 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 07:58:34AM +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> 
> > Niko Tyni <nt...@debian.org> writes:
> > I agree.  This is very likely to break things.
> > 
> > > Ansgar, could you please discuss this upstream on the perl5-porters
> > > list?
> > 
> > Just sent a message there [1].  Let's see what they think about this.
> 
> Upstream agrees that this isn't readily fixable.
> 
> I think this means that a squeeze-ignore tag and/or a severity downgrade
> would be appropriate here?

Doing the former at least, as there's no way this will be fixed in time
for Squeeze.

Regards,

Adam



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to