On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:12:01PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:59:15PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > (sid)da...@paer:~/test-0.1$ ./test > > Test 1 > > Test 2 > > Test 3 > > Thanks. Do you get something different if you rebuild with > > make OBJCFLAGS="-fexceptions -fobjc-exceptions -fgnu-runtime" > > ? (I doubt it.)
Nope, still Test 1,2,3 > Before starting the masochistic bisection procedure, We should be able to automate the bisection (if we can rely on each version being buildable..) If you can point me to the source.. and it is in git (or an svn repo I can use w/ git-svn) I can do that pretty easily I think. > it is perhaps > worth trying -base built with gcc-4.3 (new code can trigger bugs in > the compiler/runtime, so it's not absolutely certain that GCC/libobjc > are not guilty). The easiest way to test this is > > 1) Install gobjc-4.3. > > 2) Edit /usr/share/GNUstep/Makefiles/config.make: > - s/gcc/gcc-4.3/g > - Change the line > USE_OBJC_EXCEPTIONS = yes > > to > > USE_OBJC_EXCEPTIONS = no > > 3) Rebuild gnustep-base, making sure the usual compiler invocations, > e.g. > > gcc runtime.c -c \ > -MMD -MP -Wall ... > > , begin with "gcc-4.3". > > 4) Run `gdnc --help'. r...@c3700:/tmp/gnustep-base-1.20.1# gdnc --help gdnc: malloc.c:3097: sYSMALLOc: Assertion `(old_top == (((mbinptr) (((char *) &((av)->bins[((1) - 1) * 2])) - __builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd)))) && old_size == 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= (unsigned long)((((__builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd_nextsize))+((2 * (sizeof(size_t))) - 1)) & ~((2 * (sizeof(size_t))) - 1))) && ((old_top)->size & 0x1) && ((unsigned long)old_end & pagemask) == 0)' failed. Aborted -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
