Yavor Doganov writes: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:16:48PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > This leads to hashsums mismatches for these regenerated files -- > > I can only assume you haven't received (yet?) my private message to > > you earlier today when we were discussing this issue. I said: > | По-надолу има и съвет да се ползва dh_md5sums -Xvar/lib/aspell. > | Точно това съм пропуснал. Но както прецениш -- докладвай, ако > | смяташ, че така е редно. > > Translation for the sake of the maintainer/bug log: > | There is an advice to use dh_md5sums -Xvar/lib/aspell below. > | That's precisely what I've missed. But it's up to you -- report a > | bug if you believe that's the right thing.
Yes, I received that, and this is a way out, indeed, to deal with the hashsum mismatches, in case aspell-autobuildhash is only designed to work the way it is recommended in the man-page, as I cited it above. However, it doesn't strike me like extremely elegant design to ship a file with the package (to please certain design decisions taken in another package, dictionaries-common in that case) which will then be regenerated by the maintainer scripts. This would be at least, unexpected redundancy ;-) I really want to get to the bottom of it whether aspell-autobuildhash really needs the approach mentioned in the man-page. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
