On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Russ Allbery wrote: > Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> writes: > > On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Russ Allbery wrote: > > >> + <p> > >> + A package that declares the same <tt>conffile</tt> as another, > >> + conflicting package may see left-over configuration files from > >> + that other package. > > > EPARSE on this sentence, it looks like some words are missing. > > Hm. All the words that I had intended to be there are there. I clearly > need to rephrase it somehow, though, if it's not clear. How about: > > When two packages both declare the same <tt>conffile</tt>, they may > see left-over configuration files from each other even though they > conflict with each other.
I was confused by the comma. I supposed it was meant to split the whole sentence... But the second wording is better IMO. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer ◈ [Flattr=20693] Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English) ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
