On Friday, 5. October 2007 18:08:40 Ross Boylan wrote: > I seem to be having this problem too (see bug 445322). However, I > notice the report that seems to point most definitely to nvidia (see > July 10 message on this bug report) looks like a different failure from > the other ones in this bug, as well as in mine. The July 10 report has > nvidia_drv.so at the highest numbered position, whereas the others > have /usr/bin/X(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0x1e5). > > Are those two different sets of traces really for the same problem? Is > it definitely an nvidia problem? > > For the original poster: what windowing environment were you using? > > For anyone: in these backtraces, is the most recently called function > the one with the lowest number, or the highest?
Is this problem still present in the latest versions of nvidia-graphics-drivers (195.36.31-2 was uploaded to unstable this week), compiz, Xorg and the kernel? Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
