On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 06:17:53PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx dixit:
> 
> >Debian). As far as I know, it never even built properly on m68k.
> >I've added some minimal m68k support, but the last build on m68k
> >still failed to pass the regression tests.
> 
> Works for me now.

The libelf part probably shouldn't be a problem since that's
mostly generic code as far as I know.  But I guess the testsuite
shows alot of warnings.

> >I have to wonder why you get that error message in the first
> >place.  bswap_32 is normally implemented as a macro.  So I'd
> 
> Yes, I even fail to find the non-extension macro definition...
> nevertheless, with this small patch it works for me.

It normally lives somewhere in /usr/include/bits/byteswap.h,
atleast on my system.  But I suggest you get that fixed
because other callers of that "function" might expect the
same behaviour and get broken by it.

Using gcc -E might help you find the location of the macro.

> >I also wonder why you need elfutils to build a kernel.  As far
> 
> apt-get build-dep linux-2.6 #requires it.

Didn't know that yet.


Kurt




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to