Le mardi 01 février 2005 à 14:11 +0100, Ola Lundqvist a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:10:35PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > > Le vendredi 29 octobre 2004 à 21:18 +0200, Ola Lundqvist a écrit : > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 10:05:17AM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: > > > > Package: xclass-common > > > > Version: 0.8.3-1 > > > > Severity: minor > > > > > > > > The package description states about the "X windows environment", which > > > > should read "X Window System". > > > > I would like to point out the fact that the correct name is "X Window > > > > System" > > > > or "X11" (or "X11R6") for short for the current version, and sometimes > > > > "X Window" alone. > > > > > > > > More "official" information on that matter is to be found on XFree86 > > > > project's > > > > server (http://www.xfree86.org) or on X Consortium's one > > > > (http://www.x.org). > > > > > > > > I already sent a similar request for OOo a while ago, see > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2002/08/msg00148.html for more > > > > information. > > > > > > Thanks a lot for the information. > > > > > > I'll fix this on next upload. > > Any news? > > Nope. I have not made any upload yet. Thanks for reminding me > about it. I may be able to get some time to fix this little > issue. If you can (or can find someone to) NMU that is welcome. Someone NMUed the package for the C++ transition. Maybe you should upload a package to acknowledge this NMU and fix "my" afore-mentioned bug.
> Regards, > > // Ola > > > > Regards, > > > > > > // Ola -- Jérôme Warnier FLOSS Consultant http://beeznest.net
