On 2010-09-21 11:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 19:10:50 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote: > >> On 09/19/2010 06:21 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: >> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 17:21:38 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote: >> > >> >> Assuming that #596283 will be fixed by a -2 release of shadow, I was >> >> wondering whether the Release Team would like a cron -115 as well, with >> >> this feature removed from /etc/cron.daily/standard. >> >> >> > Sounds reasonable. I'm not sure introducing yet more 'Breaks' is >> > necessary though. The worst case if you're using new cron and old >> > shadow is your stuff isn't backed up, right? >> >> That is correct. However, that worst case -- however unlikely -- might >> be severe enough to warrant the Breaks:. I'm therefore tending towards >> the latter, but will leave the final call up to you. >> > I guess the other option is to leave both backups in place for squeeze, > and remove the one from cron later. A bit confusing to have those files > backed up from 2 places, but no harm other than that. I think I'd like > that more than Breaks...
How about letting cron depend on the new passwd package instead of breaking the old? ISTM this would have been the better action for #541415 as well. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org