Am 24.09.2010 13:38, schrieb Daniel Baumann: > Package: apt-dater-host > Severity: serious > > apt-dater-host uses debconf wrongly, you should use Choices-C instead of > 'translating' booleans into 0 and 1. > > currently, it's not remembering the users choice and *always* enabling > automated updates after a reconfigure or update, which is a serious bug. > > ---snip--- > r...@bob:~# dpkg-reconfigure -plow -freadline apt-dater-host > Configuring apt-dater-host > -------------------------- > > If you disable this option, you have to acknowledge every upgrade > process for > all hosts. The pro of it would be, that you will be aware of every > action apt > wants to do. The con is, that you have to attach every host on multiple > upgrades > and acknowledge every single host. > > Enable automatic upgrades? no > > > r...@bob:~# debconf-get-selections | grep apt-dater > apt-dater-host apt-dater-host/assume_yes boolean false > r...@bob:~# dpkg-reconfigure -pcritical -freadline apt-dater-host > r...@bob:~# debconf-get-selections | grep apt-dater > apt-dater-host apt-dater-host/assume_yes boolean 1 > r...@bob:~# > ---snap--- >
Oh yeah IC, buggy..
I just wanted to remove this question again and I think this may be a
good time to do it. :)
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
