On 10/04/2010 05:58 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Luk Claes <l...@debian.org> (04/10/2010): >> I understand that it can be frustrating to have these kind of build >> failures, though note that this was a new package so it may very >> well be introduced after the upload (I don't know if it's the case >> now). Anyway, thanks for the bug report, but using this kind of >> language does not help anyone... > > Please look at Jelmer's last uploads to experimental if you want > context. Out of the blue, #562389, #577880, #595644, #596745 come to > mind. Putting one of his comaintainers in Cc for further input.
First one is clearly due to changing context, second is a dupe, last two seem to be due to unfamiliarity with how experimental buildds work. I still fail to see why such language was necessary? Please try to avoid such language and maybe you could include or point to some explanation how the experimental buildds work to avoid repeated mistakes? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
